![]() ![]() The result is a more refined look that’s just as elegant and distinctive but not as loud. The chassis notches remain functional, with the left hosting the 3.5mm audio jack and the right a USB-C port for keeping the charging cable out of the way. HP scaled back that design with the Spectre x360 13.5, just like it did with the Spectre x360 16, rounding off and slimming the edges and toning down the extravagance. With its rose gold or copper accents, the 2-in-1’s aesthetic was a lovely laptop that stood apart from the crowd. The Spectre x360 14 featured HP’s dramatic gem-cut design with sharply angled edges and notches cut into the rear display and chassis corners. The Lenovo Yoga 7i Gen 7 is less expensive and offers the same CPU but, at the moment, no OLED display option. The most pertinent competitive laptop at around the same price is the Lenovo Yoga 9i Gen 7, although that 2-in-1 is heavily discounted and a few hundred dollars less than the Spectre. My review configuration was $1,700 for a Core i7-1255U, 16GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, and the OLED display. I’m not sure why HP hasn’t enabled both the maximum RAM and the OLED display, and perhaps that’s something that will change. If you want the maximum RAM, a $1,780 configuration is available with a Core i7-1255U, 32GB of RAM, a 2TB SSD, and the WUXGA+ display. At the high end, you’ll spend $1,840 for a Core i7-1255U, 16GB of RAM, a 2TB SSD, and a 13.5-inch 3:2 3K2K (3000 x 2000) OLED display. The Spectre x360 13.5 is available in several configurations, starting at $1,200 for a Core i5-1235U CPU, 8GB of RAM, a 512GB PCIe 4.0 SSD, and a WUXGA+ (1920 x 1280) IPS touch display. I reviewed a $1,700 configuration of the Spectre x360 13.5 with a Core i7-1255U and a 13.5-inch 3:2 3000×2000 OLED display. The competition has stiffened, but HP still managed to climb its way back to the top with its flagship. It’s a bit expensive, but it’s even more attractive this time around, a bonus to the improved performance and battery life. Last year’s 14-inch model, which was excellent, has now been rebranded as the Spectre x360 13.5, still carrying the same size screen but sporting a clean new design. As a recent speed test proved, having more RAM ultimately means a phone can hang on to apps for longer - in this case the Galaxy Note10+ with its 12GB of RAM didn't reload a single app, while the iPhone XS Max needed to drop apps from its 4GB of RAM. However, CPU performance is one thing, but RAM is another altogether. ![]() In our fresh ASUS ROG Phone II review we put the Snapdragon 855+ chipset against Samsung's Exynos 9825 and they're not really close to the score posted by the Apple A13 Bionic. ![]() The phone scored 5,472 in single-core and 13,769 in multi-core, which puts it head and shoulders above any smartphone. #Iphone 11 geekbench androidWhat's more interesting is the listed 4GB of RAM, which would put the iPhone 11 Pro on the same level as the iPhone XS and way behind current Android opposition.Īs Geekbench is a CPU benchmark, RAM wasn't an issue in the iPhone 11 Pro's decimation of all Android competition. ![]() An alleged iPhone 11 Pro has popped up on Geekbench, sporting an Apple A13 Bionic hexa-core chip and iOS 13. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |